Annotated+Bibliography

 Works Cited  “Attack At Pearl Harbor, 1941.” //Eye Witness History//. N.p., 1997. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. . This web article is a primary source published by eye witness history. This is a credible source because it is an eye witness account of Pearl Harbor by one of the sailors on board of the USS Arizona. The article talks about how unexpected the attack was to the average sailor and how chaotic it was on the Arizona after Pearl Harbor was attacked. This article was perfect for us to use on our background and information for our video. It illustrated perfectly how unprepared people were and how chaotic it got when the attack happened which was great information for our project.   “Background to Pearl Harbor.” //Navy History//. History Central, 2005. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. . This article about pearl harbor is a secondary source web article. The website is produced by the HIstory central. I did some cross checking on History central and everything i found backed up my belief that they are a credible source. The actual wep-page is reliable, i know this because i cross checked the facth i found and every single one of the was supported on multiple sites. This information will help meon the background portion of our project. It references many key factors of why Pearl Harbor took place and we will be able to use many of those in our project.   Imperial War Museum, prod. “Strategic Background: Why Pearl Harbor?” //Pearl Harbor//. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. . This web-article is a secondary source published by Imperial War Museum. This is a credible source because it is an official website of a large museum in England. The museum specializes in 20th century conflict and Pearl Harbor occured during this time. This article provides a summary of the main causes of Pearl Harbor and how the U.S. could have known about it through certain signs that the Japanese gave. This article will help us with our project, especially our background, because it talks about how many signs of the attack happening were present before Pearl Harbor happened.   “Japan on the offensive.” //Brief history of wwii//. US army center for military history, 2001. Web. 2 Feb. 2011. <http://www.worldwariihistory.info/​WWII/​Japan.html>. This article about pearl harbor is a secondary source. I believe the website to be reliable because it is produceed by the army. Naturally the army is a very reliable source for war time fact. I know the individual page is reliable because i found the same facts on several different websites. I will be uses the information for my actual history page. <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 13.5pt;"> <span style="color: black; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 12pt;">Pearl Harbor, prod. “What happened?” //Official Site of the Attack on Pearl Harbor//. N.p., 2011. Web. 12 Jan. 2011. <http://www.pearlharbor.org/​history-of-pearl-harbor.asp>. This web article is a secondary source published by Pearl Harbor History. This site is credible because all information is directly cited to the primary source where the information was received. By using all primary sources to compile this article and citing the information, this source is credible. This source talked about before the attack, the attack, and what happened as a result of the attack, all the way up to modern day. This site helped immensely with our real and alternative history as it talked about many key events happening as a result of Pearl Harbor. <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 13.5pt;"> <span style="color: black; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 12pt;">“What happened in the Months after Pearl Harbor.” //National Geographic//. N.p., 2001. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.nationalgeographic.com/​pearlharbor/​ngbeyond/​stories/​story8.html>. This web article is a secondary source published by National geographic. This source is credible because National Geographic is a major corporation that produced a documentary on Pearl Harbor along with many other history subjects. This source had sections answering certain questions such as “Were there any warning signs?” and “What happened in the months following Pearl Harbor?”. These essential questions being answered helped us with our background and our real history page. <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 13.5pt;"> <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 13.5pt;"> <span style="color: black; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT,serif; font-size: 12pt;">Fuchida, Mitsuo. “Attack At Pearl Harbor, 1941, The Japanese View.” //EyeWitnesstoHistory.com//. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Jan. 2011. < <span style="color: blue; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT,serif; font-size: 12pt;">http://www. eyewitnesstohistory.com/ <span style="color: black; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT,serif; font-size: 12pt;">‌ pfpearl2.htm>. This interview is a primary source and Mitsuo Fuchida the person who was interviewed was a commander of a Japanese air force unit that was the first wave of attack on Pearl Harbor. In the interview he talks about the Japanese viewpoint of the attack and what he and his unit did during the attack on Pearl Harbor. This source is being used for our project because it explains what the Japanese did to prepare for the attack and how they conducted it. It will help us not only get the American viewpoint on the attack but help us understand why and how the Japanese army attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; font-size: 13.5pt;">